The following is a special contribution from EmilyKate, a loyal friend-of-Zigzaggers (see her sewing machine reviews here, here, and here). This wonderful and helpful bit of information will be particularly useful for owners of vintage sewing machines that only sew a straight stitch. Find EmilyKate at her blog; and if I may be so bold, I'd like to particularly recommend a lovely post about her grandmother, here -- it's not sewing-machine-related, but her thoughts about the aesthetic traditions that are passed down in families are relevant and touching. Herewith, EmilyKate introduces buttonholers:
Many sewers who use vintage straight-stitch only machines believe they can't use them for making buttonholes -- the needle has to be able to zigzag for that, right?
Actually, it doesn't! Back in the day, sewing machine companies invented clever little gadgets that attach to straight-stitch machines: They clamp onto the garment fabric and wiggle it back-and-forth and side-to-side under the needle, creating the buttonhole. The gadgets, which were called automatic buttonholers, are readily available on eBay and sometimes show up in thrift stores. Some of the brand names they were marketed under were Greist, Singer, White, and Famous. Kenmore also made one for their machines.
There are two types -- one type uses interchangeable templates for different sizes and shapes of buttonholes (straight or keyhole-shaped); the other makes only straight buttonholes the length and width of which are adjusted with levers and knobs. You can pick up either type pretty cheaply on eBay -- expect to pay anything from $5 to $25.
It's important to make sure you buy an attachment that has the correct shank type for your machine. Most vintage machines take low-shank, side attaching attachments, but there are slant-shank variations (for slant-shank Singers, obvisously), and if you have a vintage Japanese-made machine you may need a high-shank attachment. (ed note: See Ed Lamoureux's blog here for more information about shank types.)
If you want to see a buttonholer in action, check out this video I posted on BurdaStyle!
EmilyKate convinced me, and I bought a buttonholer from eBay for $6.27 (plus $7 shipping) to use on my 1972 White zigzag machine. I've never mastered the 4-step buttonhole -- it doesn't seem to work quite right on the machine (the zigzags on one side come out a lot wider than on the other side), and I always lose track of the start and end points and go past them. Sigh.
But this attachment -- it really is amazing! It does the whole thing for me, thank goodness. Now I'm really psyched to get to the buttons on the shirtdress I'm making now, though I'd been dreading them until this amazing gadget arrived in my mailbox!
Posted by: Krista | February 28, 2009 at 12:41 PM
Nice bargain! They really take the fear out don't they- you know you're gonna get perfect buttonholes so you're not stressing out about am-I-about-to-ruin-garment-I-spent so-much-time-working-on. That;s really worth any price I think!
I should add for anyone else looking to buy, I've recently seen a few buttonholers come up for sale on etsy too.
Posted by: EmilyKate | March 03, 2009 at 08:36 PM
Intersting blog about sewing machines. Thanks for the information. You can also find useful information about sewing and other machines at:
http://ads.machinestogo.net
Posted by: Machines | March 20, 2009 at 01:55 AM
Emily Kate's absolutely right about the buttonholers. They do make the Very Best Buttonholes--much, much better than the newer machines can make. A few months ago, after sewing test buttonholes on scrap materials every time I needed one, I followed Singer's suggestion and made a sample buttonhole of each size on a strip of fabric. I labeled each one and hung it on my bulletinboard. Wish I'd done that ages ago!
Posted by: Robbie Brewington | April 09, 2009 at 02:50 PM
I need one of this
¡where can I by?
Posted by: Alejandro igil | May 14, 2010 at 10:47 AM
Thank you for this information. I did think that I needed a zigzag to do buttonholes.
I will do my research on ebay.
Thanks again!
Posted by: tane | October 28, 2010 at 09:08 PM